Real vs. artificial: What is the most sustainable type of Christmas tree?

Christmas trees are a European tradition stretching back hundreds of years. But in this century, questions have arisen about whether this tradition is truly sustainable. Cutting down trees is bad, right? And buying a fake plastic tree cannot be good for the environment, can it? So what is the greenest option?

First up, the real Christmas tree. Some may think that chopping down a tree for a festive ornamental display is akin to deforestation. But real Christmas trees, which are usually evergreen conifers – such as a fir, spruce or pine trees – are a sustainable crop typically grown in a nine-year harvest cycle. For every tree felled for Christmas, one or more will be planted in its place. It means that you can think of the real Christmas tree as the more natural choice.

Artificial trees, on the other hand, are most definitely fake. They are likely to be made from a plastic called polyvinyl chloride, or PVC, which produces greenhouse gases while it is manufactured nor is it biodegradable. In fact, PVC is one of the most difficult plastics to recycle. There is also cardboard packaging to consider and the emissions that are generated as these fake trees are shipped across the globe from the factory to your home.

According to the Carbon Trust, a two-meter-tall artificial tree produces about 40 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e), whereas a similar-sized real Christmas tree, with no roots, creates 3.5 kg CO2e – more than 10 times less.

The importance of Christmas tree disposal

So, the real Christmas tree is the winner and the greener option? Not quite so. There’s a catch. Because how you dispose of a real tree is more significant than where it comes from or how you got it home.

If your real Christmas tree ends up in landfill, its carbon footprint jumps almost fivefold to 16kg CO2e because during decomposition it will release methane, a greenhouse gas that’s 30 times more potent than CO2. The best way to dispose of a real tree is by burning it in a bonfire or by shredding it and spreading it over the garden.

Artificial trees are not all bad. They are often cheaper and are flame retardant, which is important for trees used in public places. And they can be used year-after-year. If you have a fake tree and reuse it for at least 10 Christmases, then the carbon footprint over its lifetime will likely be about the same as a cremated real tree.

And the winner is…?

Well, there is an alternative: potted trees. They can be replanted in your garden after the festive season and reused year-after-year.

“The best thing you can do at Christmas is to keep your tree alive and breathing as it will naturally absorb CO2 and release oxygen. So potted trees are the most sustainable option, but they need looking after,” says Anja-Lea Fischer, Global Head Operational Sustainability at Zurich Insurance Group.

If you don’t have a garden to replant your potted tree, then there’s another alternative: rent a real Christmas tree. Many garden centers and plant nurseries offer this service. They then replant the tree and re-hire it for the next Christmas.

“The debate over what type of Christmas tree is the friendliest to the environment comes up every year,” says Fischer. “But there are other aspects of Christmas with more damaging impacts on the planet, such as the increase in flight travel, the resources required for gifts and their packaging and the mountains of waste.

“When it comes to your Christmas tree,” she continues, “focus on what best suits your lifestyle, meets your family traditions and, most importantly, makes you happy.”